Trending Topic

Stastical analysis indication diabetes mellitus .generative ai
5 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Saptarshi Bhattacharya, Sanjay Kalra, Lakshmi Nagendra

Very few trials in the history of medical science have altered the treatment landscape as profoundly as the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). Even 44 years after its inception, the trial and post-study follow-up findings continue to fascinate and enlighten the medical community. The study was conceived at a time when there was uncertainty about […]

2 mins

Treatment Options for Pediatric Diabetes

M Loredana Marcovecchio
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: May 23rd 2018 US Endocrinology. 2018;14(1):20–21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/USE.2018.14.1.20
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

The needs of pediatric patients with diabetes differ from those of adults. Challenges include
growth and development, and care outside of the home, such as in the school setting. In addition,
in type 2 diabetes, there are fewer treatment options for pediatric patients; while recent years
have seen the approval of many glucose-lowering drugs for adults, only metformin and insulin are
approved in patients aged under 18 years. In an expert interview, M Loredana Marcovecchio, of the
University of Cambridge, UK, discusses recent advances and remaining challenges in the treatment of
pediatric patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Keywords

Pediatric diabetes, insulin sensitivity, agespecific
approach, insulin pump, continuous
glucose monitoring, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-
1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors

2

Article

Q. What are the major challenges of treating pediatric type 1 and 2 diabetes?

Achieving optimal glycemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes remains a major challenge. Management of diabetes requires an age-specific approach, taking into account the needs and characteristics related to specific developmental stages. Variable eating patterns and physical activity, along with the limited ability to communicate symptoms of hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia are the main challenges in very young children. During adolescence, changes in insulin sensitivity related to physical growth and pubertal hormonal changes, psychological and behavioral issues and poor compliance can complicate diabetes management. Additional factors contributing to challenges in young people with diabetes include family dynamics, health status and care outside home, such as in the school setting.

Q. What have been the most important advances in the treatment of type 1 diabetes in children?

Insulin is the cornerstone of treatment of type 1 diabetes. Since its discovery almost a century ago, there have been key milestones which have improved treatment: the introduction of insulin analogues with better pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles; the implementation of newer devices for insulin administrations; and alternative ways of insulin delivery. Of particular note are the recent advances in diabetes technology, these include insulin pump therapy, continuous glucose monitoring and sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy, which are leading the way towards the development of a ‘closed-loop system’ or ‘artificial pancreas’.

Developments in diabetes technology are fast-moving and hold promise to improve quality of life and outcomes. However, technology does not necessarily ‘fit’ every patient, and in children and adolescents its introduction in daily routine care can pose some psychological and ‘time-effort’ burdens, which need to be addressed.

Q. How do you treat type 2 diabetes in children who cannot meet their glycemic targets using metformin and lifestyle intervention?

Based on current recommendations, lifestyle interventions represent the first-line of managing pediatric type 2 diabetes. Metformin can be introduced if there is no benefit of lifestyle interventions.

Unfortunately, compared to adult-onset type 2 diabetes, there are fewer treatment options for youth. Up to now, metformin and insulin are the only agents approved for the management of type 2 diabetes in adolescents. Therefore, when glycemic targets are not reached, insulin is the only additional approved therapeutic option. A long-acting insulin can be firstly introduced and, if this is not enough, the addition of a meal-time short-acting insulin is the next step.

Q. Is there any evidence to support the use of other antidiabetic drugs, such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, or sodium-glucose cotransporter 2, in patients aged under 18 years?

Whereas many antidiabetic drugs are licensed for use in adults with type 2 diabetes in the US and Europe, only metformin is approved for pediatric use in most countries. Many clinical trials of anti-hyperglycemic agents are underway in youth-onset type 2 diabetes (NCT03429543, NCT01554618, NCT03170518) should be available in a few years.

Q. Of the above drugs, which would you expect to be most useful in a pediatric population?

There is a strong need for future studies assessing each of the above drugs in pediatric type 2 diabetes, due to potential differences in safety and efficacy profiles between different age groups. In adults, drugs such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SLGT2) inhibitors have been associated not only with reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), but with other beneficial effects on weight loss, blood pressure, renal function and cardiovascular outcomes. Given that type 2 diabetes often presents a more aggressive course in the pediatric population with high rates of complications already at the time of diagnosis, SLGT2 inhibitors might be a useful therapeutic option in this age group.

3

Article Information

Disclosure

M Loredana Marcovecchio has
nothing to disclose in relation to this article.

Review Process

This is an expert interview and as such
has not undergone the journal’s standard peer review
process.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International
Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria
for authorship of this manuscript, take responsibility
for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have
given final approval to the version to be published.

Correspondence

M. Loredana Marcovecchio,
University of Cambridge, Box 116, Level 8, Cambridge
Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2
0QQ, UK. E: mlm45@medschl.cam.ac.uk

Support

No funding was received in
the publication of this article.

Access

This article is published under the Creative
Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which
permits any noncommercial use, distribution, adaptation,
and reproduction provided the original author(s) and
source are given appropriate credit. ©The Authors 2018.

Received

2018-04-22T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup