Trending Topic

Stastical analysis indication diabetes mellitus .generative ai
5 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Saptarshi Bhattacharya, Sanjay Kalra, Lakshmi Nagendra

Very few trials in the history of medical science have altered the treatment landscape as profoundly as the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). Even 44 years after its inception, the trial and post-study follow-up findings continue to fascinate and enlighten the medical community. The study was conceived at a time when there was uncertainty about […]

2 mins

Using Diabetes Therapy Management Software to Support Behavior Change—A Case-based Approach

George Grunberger
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: May 16th 2012 US Endocrinology, 2012;8(1):17-21 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/USE.2012.08.01.17
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

The management of diabetes is complex and requires a team approach for optimal outcomes. This team is comprised of the patient, numerous healthcare providers, and various technologies to elicit the behavioral changes needed in the ongoing care of the disease. This paper uses a case-based approach to demonstrate the patient–healthcare provider relationship and the use of various technologies when managing diabetes. The use of diabetes therapy management software demonstrates enhanced patient–healthcare provider communication, provides data showing that behavioral changes can improve outcomes, and allows the patient to enact positive self-management practices.

Keywords

Type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemia, insulin pump therapy (IPT), continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), diabetes therapy management software, sensor-augmented pump therapy (SATP)

2

Article

Diabetes outcomes are determined largely by self-management of complex behaviors.1 People who use intensive insulin regimens, for example, are taught that healthy blood glucose levels depend on balancing the amount of energy in the food they absorb with the amount of energy they expend while adapting their insulin dose to both.

Diabetes outcomes are determined largely by self-management of complex behaviors.1 People who use intensive insulin regimens, for example, are taught that healthy blood glucose levels depend on balancing the amount of energy in the food they absorb with the amount of energy they expend while adapting their insulin dose to both. This involves multiple interrelated actions—e.g., carbohydrate counting, adjusting the timing and/or dosing of insulin administration, and altering the frequency or method of blood glucose monitoring—which are, in turn, subject to emotional, cultural, and social influences. Today’s healthcare environment rarely allows time to sort out these intertwining issues, making effective, long-term behavior change difficult for patients and practitioners alike.2,3

Diabetes technologies—namely, blood glucose meters, insulin pumps, and continuous glucose monitors—have evolved in response to this challenge. When used with compatible web-based therapy management software, data from these devices may be downloaded to personal or office computers for a quick, comprehensive view of how insulin timing or dosage, food choices and portions, exercise, and other behavioral factors interact to affect glucose control.4 This visual feedback from customized reports can serve as a “road-map” during consultation for pinpointing barriers to effective self-care and eliciting practical solutions at the level of the individual patient. Therapy management software for personal and professional use has benefits that may include:

  • expediting data interpretation;
  • enhancing patient–healthcare provider communication;
  • motivating behavior change in real-world situations;
  • showing the versatility of this clinical tool; and
  • increasing patient and provider confidence in their ability to enact or induce positive self-management practices.

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

2

References

  1. Funnell MM, Anderson RM, Empowerment and selfmanagement
    of diabetes, Clin Diabetes, 2004;22:123–7.

  2. Van Dam HA, van der Horst F, van den Borne B, et al.,
    Provider-patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on
    patient self-care and outcomes. A systematic review,
    Patient Educ Couns, 2003;51:17–28.

  3. Mosley K, Aslam A, Speight J, Overcoming barriers to diabetes
    care: Perceived communication issues of healthcare
    professionals attending a pilot Diabetes UK training
    programme, Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2010;87:e11–4.

  4. Hirsch IB, Blood glucose monitoring technology: translating
    data into practice, Endocr Pract, 2004;10:67–76.

  5. Bergenstal RM, Tamborlane WV, Ahmann A, et al.,
    Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in
    type 1 diabetes, N Engl J Med, 2010;363:311–20.

  6. Davis SN, Horton ES, Battelino T, et al., STAR 3 randomized
    controlled trial to compare sensor-augmented insulin pump
    therapy with multiple daily injections in the treatment of type 1
    diabetes: research design, methods, and baseline characteristics
    of enrolled subjects, Diabetes Technol Ther, 2010;12:249–55.

  7. Rubin RR, Borgman SK, Sulik BT, Crossing the technology
    divide: practical strategies for transitioning patients from
    multiple daily insulin injections to sensor-augmented pump
    therapy, Diabetes Educ, 2011;37(Suppl. 1):5S–18S; quiz 19S–20S.

  8. Handelsman Y, Mechanick JI, Blonde L, et al., American
    Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for
    Clinical Practice for developing a diabetes mellitus
    comprehensive care plan, Endocr Pract, 2011:17(Suppl. 2):1–53.

  9. American Diabetes Association, Standards of medical care in
    diabetes – 2011, Diabetes Care, 2011;34(Suppl. 1):S11–S61.

  10. Heinemann L, Nosek L, Kapitza C, et al., Changes in basal
    insulin infusion rates with subcutaneous insulin infusion: time
    until a change in metabolic effect is induced in patients with
    type 1 diabetes, Diabetes Care, 2009;32:1437–9.

  11. Grunberger G, Bailey TS, Cohen AJ, et al., Statement by the
    American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Consensus
    Panel on insulin pump management, Endocr Pract, 2010;16:746–62.

  12. Shetty G, Wolpert H, Insulin pump use in adults with type 1
    diabetes – practical issues, Diabetes Technol Ther, 2010;
    12(Suppl. 1):S11–6.

  13. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Patient empowerment: myths and
    misconceptions, Patient Educ Couns, 2010;79:277–82.

  14. Scheiner G, Sobel RJ, Smith DE, et al., Insulin pump therapy:
    guidelines for successful outcomes, Diabetes Educ, 2009;
    35(Suppl. 2):29S–41S; quiz 28S, 42S–3S.

  15. Kaufman N, Internet and information technology use in
    treatment of diabetes, Int J Clin Pract Suppl, 2010;166:41–6.

  16. Nardacci EA, Bode BW, Hirsch IB, Individualizing care for the
    many: the evolving role of professional continuous glucose
    monitoring systems in clinical practice, Diabetes Educ,
    2010;36(Suppl. 1):4S–19S; quiz 20S–1S.

  17. Blevins TC, Bode BW, Garg SK, et al., Statement by the American
    Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Consensus Panel on
    continuous glucose monitoring, Endocr Pract, 2010;16:730–45.

3

Article Information

Disclosure

George Grunberger, MD, FACP, FACE, has received consultancy fees from Medtronic Diabetes.

Correspondence

George Grunberger, MD, FACP, FACE, Grunberger Diabetes Institute, 43494 Woodward Ave, Ste 208, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-5054, US. E: grunberger@gdi-pc.com

Support

The publication of this article was funded by Medtronic Diabetes. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Medtronic Diabetes.

Received

2012-04-10T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup