Specialities

Specialities

Bone Disorders
Cardiovascular Risk
COVID-19
Diabetes
Endocrine Oncology
General Endocrinology
Obesity
Paediatric Endocrinology
Pituitary Disorders
Reproductive Endocrinology
Thyroid Disorders
Chronic Kidney Disease
Liver Disorders
Adrenal Disorders
Search

Trending Topic

Stastical analysis indication diabetes mellitus .generative ai
5 mins

Trending Topic
Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Forty-four Years of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study: Legacy Effect and Beyond

Saptarshi Bhattacharya, Sanjay Kalra, Lakshmi Nagendra

Very few trials in the history of medical science have altered the treatment landscape as profoundly as the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). Even 44 years after its inception, the trial and post-study follow-up findings continue to fascinate and enlighten the medical community. The study was conceived at a time when there was uncertainty about […]

touchREVIEWS in Endocrinology. 2024;21(1):1–2:Online ahead of journal publication

Connect With Us:

Facebook
X (Twitter)
Instagram
Youtube
Linkedin
Endocrine Oncology
4 mins

Developments in Digestive Tract Neuroendocrine Tumors and Pheochromocytomas/Paragangliomas—A Narrative Review

Ioannis Ilias, Karel Pacak
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Mar 20th 2012 US Endocrinology, 2011;7(1):59-64 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/USE.2011.07.01.59
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Digestive neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoids) derive from serotonin-producing enterochromaffin cells. Biochemical screening (and follow-up) is performed with measurements of 5-hydroxyindoloacetic acid in urine. Other markers are also useful. Most digestive neuroendocrine tumors are better localized with functional imaging, i.e. nuclear medicine, compared with other modalities. The treatment of choice is surgical; non-resectable tumors are treated with somatostatin analogs (unlabelled and for more advanced disease radiolabelled) or chemotherapy. Most pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas are sporadic, however, and genetically caused tumors are much more common than previously thought. Biochemical proof of disease is best carried out with measurement of plasma metadrenaline. Imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be followed by functional imaging. Chromaffin tumor-specific methods are preferred. 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-DOPA PET) should be used in patients with succinate-dehydrogenase-B-related metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. 18F-DOPA PET may become a modality of choice for the localization of head and neck paragangliomas. If possible, treatment is surgical. For non-operable disease, other options are available and new drugs are under investigation or in clinical trials.

Keywords

Digestive neuroendocrine tumors, pheochromocytomas, paragangliomas, metadrenaline, radionuclide imaging, succinate dehydrogenase complex

2

Article

Digestive Neuroendocrine Tumors
Digestive neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoids) derive from serotonin-producing enterochromaffin cells. The digestive neuroendocrine tumors are classified as:

  • foregut—originating from the esophagus to the pancreas;
  • midgut—‘classic’; presenting with the carcinoid syndrome that includes flushing, diarrhea and hypotension. They originate from the jejunum to the right colon and gonads; or
  • hindgut—‘silent’; originating from the transverse colon to the rectum.


Digestive Neuroendocrine Tumors
Digestive neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoids) derive from serotonin-producing enterochromaffin cells. The digestive neuroendocrine tumors are classified as:

  • foregut—originating from the esophagus to the pancreas;
  • midgut—‘classic’; presenting with the carcinoid syndrome that includes flushing, diarrhea and hypotension. They originate from the jejunum to the right colon and gonads; or
  • hindgut—‘silent’; originating from the transverse colon to the rectum.

More than half of digestive neuroendocrine tumors originate in the gastrointestinal tract (with half of these in the small intestine), and the remaining from the lungs/bronchi. The overall incidence of digestive neuroendocrine tumors is estimated to be one to five per million population.1 Patients with midgut digestive neuroendocrine tumors may complain of vague abdominal symptoms for a long time (approximately nine years) before classic symptoms and signs, such as flushing, and excess gastrointestinal motility are observed.2,3 At this time, the disease has metastasized in 90 % of symptomatic patients.2,3 More than half of patients with digestive neuroendocrine tumors—via mechanisms that are not clearly understood— suffer from irreversible carcinoid heart disease. The endocardium shows fibrous thickening and the tricuspid and pulmonary valves are fixated.2,4 Genetics
Ten per cent of individuals with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 1 have digestive neuroendocrine tumors. MEN1 is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by deletion of the MEN1 suppressor gene on chromosome 11q13. Forty to 80 % of patients with sporadic digestive neuroendocrine tumors also show loss of heterozygozity in chromosome 11 or deletion of the MEN1 gene.2,5 Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors are associated with mutations in the p53 suppressor gene and variability in B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) expression.2 Studies of polymorphisms of the nuclear factor-kappaB (NFκB) transcription factor tentatively point to differences in the genetics of digestive neuroendocrine tumors vis-à-vis pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.6

Biochemical Diagnosis
Digestive neuroendocrine tumors in the fore- and midgut metabolize tryptophan to 5-hydroxytryptophan and synthesize and secrete neck-to-pelvis distribution and parasympathetic paraganglia are found in the neck and skull base.

Paragangliomas that are localized in the adrenal medulla are called pheochromocytomas (or more uncommonly termed adrenal medullary paragangliomas).54 The term ‘extra-adrenal pheochromocytomas’ is used to describe tumors of the sympathoadrenal system. There are no universally established criteria for defining malignancy in pheochromocytomas/ paragangliomas. However, capsular invasion, large tumor size (>5 cm) and weight (>80 g) may be indicators of malignancy. The clinical course may indicate malignancy, particularly with recurrent or metastatic disease.

Pheochromocytomas (i.e. adrenal medullary paragangliomas) are rare tumors with an annual incidence of one to four per million population.55 Furthermore, 0.5 % of subjects with hypertension and 4 % of those with an incidental adrenal mass have pheochromocytoma.55 The caveat is that these figures are approximate, since until a few years ago 18–60 % of tumors remained undiagnosed.54 The average lag time from the onset of hypertension to the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is three years.56 Peak age for diagnosis of pheochromocytomas is between 40 and 50 years, with an almost equal female/male ratio. In most cases (downgraded from 90 to 85 % or less with the advent of newer molecular genetics studies, see below for details) these tumors are adrenal, sporadic, and solitary.

The symptoms of pheochromocytomas vary. The triad of tachycardia with diaphoresis and cephalalgia is encountered in 40–80 % of patients and is highly sensitive and specific for a presumptive diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.57,58 Hypertension—newly diagnosed or an exacerbation of known hypertension, most often paroxysmal—is common, occurring in over 90 % of patients, but is non-specific.58 Most paragangliomas are intra-abdominal and adjacent to the adrenals (approximately 85 %). Less than 15 % are intrathoracic and 1–3 % are cervical.59 Chromaffin-negative neuroendocrine tumors in the head and neck that are related to the parasympathetic nervous system, such as those originating from the carotid bodies or jugular bulbs, are also termed paragangliomas.60

Genetics
Familial syndromes with pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas include55 MEN type 2 (MEN 2); von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome; neuroectodermal dysplasias – neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1), tuberous sclerosis and Sturge-Weber syndrome; and other familial paragangliomas, especially those related to succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) gene mutations. In children, familial tumors are found twice as often as in adults.61 Activating germline mutations in the REarranged during Transfection (RET) proto-oncogene, usually in codons 634 or 918 (10q11.2), are implicated in the abnormal cellular proliferation of MEN 2 syndrome. Pheochromocytomas are usually adrenal and benign in MEN 2 and are bilateral in more than 50 % of patients.55

Missense mutations in the VHL tumor suppressor gene, usually in codon 167, 3p25–26, are commonly implicated in the pathogenesis of VHL syndrome. Twenty to 50 % of subjects have mostly benign adrenal pheochromocytomas, and slightly less than 50 % have bilateral disease.62 The genetic background of pheochromocytomas observed in subjects with neuroectodermal dysplasias is yet to be elucidated. Mutations in the NF-1 tumor suppressor gene—associated with von Recklinghausen’s disease—have been observed (17q11.2; in 90 % of cases). The risk of pheochromocytoma in patients with NF-1 is approximately 1–5 %.56,63

Familial pheochromocytomas or head/neck paragangliomas are seen in subjects with germline mutations in subunits B, C and D of the SDH gene. The risk of extra-adrenal and/or malignant disease is high for SDHB mutation carriers.62 SDHB mutations also predispose to head and neck paragangliomas.64 SDHC mutations are a rare cause of head and neck paragangliomas.64 SDHD mutations are associated with benign adrenal and extra-adrenal paragangliomas or multifocal head and neck paragangliomas.64 SDHB/SDHD mutations have been found in patients with Carney-Stratakis syndrome (they also have paragangliomas).65 The former are also associated with renal tumors, gastrointestinal stroma cancer and thyroid cancer.61 Mutations in the SDHA and SDHAF2 (SDH 5) family were recently found and linked to hereditary, but not sporadic, paragangliomas.66–69

It has been suggested that the transmembrane-encoding gene TMEM127 (chromosome 2q11) is a newly discovered pheochromocytoma susceptibility gene. Pheochromocytomas with TMEM127 mutations are transcriptionally related to tumors bearing NF1 mutations.70 Expression of SNAIL (a zinc-finger transcription factor) may predict the metastatic potential of pheochromocytoma.71

Approximately 15 % of all pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas are associated with germline SDH mutations. Immunohistochemistry is apparently the most cost-effective method of genetic testing—particularly if biochemistry is not available or considered, or results are negative.61,72,73 Furthermore, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that genetic testing should be carried out in all patients with pheochromocytomas-paragangliomas. If cost is a concern, then testing should at least be available to those <50 years.61

Biochemical Diagnosis
Chromaffin tumors that are hormonally active may secrete catecholamines episodically, however, they metabolize catecholamines to metanephrines continuously. Free metanephrines in plasma and 24-hour urinary fractionated free metanephrines are the most accurate methods for establishing the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Their respective sensitivity ranges from 99–100 (plasma) and 97–100 % (urine) and their specificity is 89–94 (plasma) and 69–95 % (urine).61 Biochemistry is not only useful for establishing the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma but can also guide further testing (including genetic testing). In subjects with MEN2 or NF1, there is predominantly elevation in metadrenaline, whereas in subjects with VHL there is predominantly elevation in normetadrenaline.61 Care must be taken to normalize metadrenaline levels for populations with normal blood pressure, match them for gender and age,74 and avoid interference from medications.75 Dynamic testing is rarely sought.Gucagon testing is now considered to be obsolete.76 Suppression with clonidine and measurement of plasma-free normetadrenaline is accurate but applies only to normetadrenaline-secreting tumors.77 Head and neck paragangliomas were previously rarely considered to be hormonally active. A substantial number of them (almost one-third) are, however, biochemically active. This is supported by increased excretion of the dopamine metabolite 3-methoxytyramine.78 Most abdominal and thoracic SDHB-paragangliomas hypersecrete either normetadrenaline or normetadrenaline and dopamine. Some only hypersecrete dopamine and are almost silent biochemically.64

Imaging
CT imaging has 93–100 % sensitivity for detecting intra-adrenal pheochromocytomas of approximately 0.5 cm in diameter.79 The sensitivity of CT is slightly lower, at 90 %, for localizing extra-adrenal disease of approximately 1 cm in size.79

MRI offers slightly better sensitivity. Pheochromocytomas usually show a characteristic very high T2-weighted signal on MRI unless there is a hemorrhage or intratumoral necrosis. MRI is very good for evaluating the relationship of pheochromocytomas with blood vessels. This is of importance when surgery is planned.

CT/MRI should be used in patients with biochemically proved pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. For most patients imaging is limited to the adrenals/abdomen, whereas evaluations of the thorax, neck and head are used when there is suspicion of malignant/ metastatic disease. For head and neck paragangliomas, MRI may better explore tumor anatomy vis-à-vis this region’s blood vessels. Conventional or MRI angiography may also be very helpful.80–82 Although positive CT/MRI studies can be diagnostic, their specificity may vary from 50–90 %.55 Thus, negative anatomical imaging studies may not be diagnostic.83 Furthermore in patients with previous surgery poor quality imaging may lessen utility, particularly if recurrence is suspected.79 For such cases and for cases of extra-adrenal or malignant/ metastatic disease, the use of functional methods is preferred. There are two paths for functional imaging of chromaffin tumors.

  • Specific methods for these tumors, since chromaffin tumors express the human noradrenaline transporter (hNAT). This permits the use of radiolabelled ligands of molecules that enter the catecholamine synthesis pathway or their analogues and specific vesicular monoamine transporters for storage in intracytoplasmic vesicles.
  • Non-specific methods that make use of the high glucose metabolism of tumors or expression of STRs.84

Specific functional imaging methods should be carried out first. If results are negative, non-specific modalities should be sought, particularly if recurrent, metastatic or malignant disease is suspected. MIBG is a catecholamine precursor that is taken into pheochromocytoma cells via hNAT. Nowadays, it is labelled with iodine-123 (123I-MIBG), permitting better quality imaging than 131I-MIBG. CT imaging—standalone or as single-photon emission CT (SPECT)—is also possible.85

Dopamine is a catecholamine precursor. PET with 18F-dopamine is better than 131I-MIBG for imaging adrenal and/or benign pheochromocytomas or localizing metastatic pheochromocytomas.86–88 DOPA is converted into dopamine and then transported into pheochromocytomas by hNAT (the large neutral amino acid transporter may also play a role in this). Standalone PET with 18F-DOPA or combined with CT has been used for localizing benign adrenal pheochromocytomas and head and neck paragangliomas with good results.89–91

PET with 18F-labelled deoxyglucose (FDG) is currently widely available and is used for localizing various tumors and the staging of neoplastic disease. FDG PET is a convenient and accessible modality for localizing pheochromocytomas that are negative with specific functional imaging modalities (particularly metastatic disease).

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas express STRs (mostly types 2, 3, and 5), although conflicting results have been presented in the past.92–97 Octreotide is an octapeptidic somatostatin analog that is labelled with 111In for SRS. Despite intense splachnic/renal abdominal accumulation, it is a useful non-specific tool for localizing malignant and/or metastatic pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas with a sensitivity approaching 90 %.98

18F-dopamine PET/CT is the preferred technique for localizing primary pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas and to rule out metastases. 18F-DOPA PET and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy make an equally good second choice. For patients with known metastatic paraganglioma, 18F-dopamine PET is the choice for those with an unknown genotype. 18F-FDG/18Fdopamine PET should be the preferred option in SDHB mutation carriers. 18F-DOPA/18F-dopamine PET is preferable in non-SDHB patients.64,99

Management
The definitive treatment for pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma is surgery. For hormonally active tumors, a pre-operative blood pressure-lowering/normalisation regimen should be followed using selective alpha1 blockers (prazosin, doxazosin and others) or non-selective, non-competitive alpha blockers (phenoxybenzamine). If, despite selectivity tachycardia ensues, beta blockade is given after sufficient alpha blockade has been achieved.56,100,101 Pre-operative management with calcium blockers, nifedipine, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or alpha-methyl-para tyrosine (Demser) have been also used.100,102,103

Laparoscopic surgery is possible for abdominal tumors up to 9 cm in diameter. Partial (cortical-sparing) adrenalectomy is used more often—particularly for small tumors.104–106 A transabdominal approach is reserved for malignant tumors,107 where debulking surgery and/or adrenalectomy is advised.108 Non-competitive alpha blockade with long-acting agents such as phenoybenzamine is preferred for keeping blood pressure under control in patients with symptomatic malignant and/or inoperable disease.56 Demser is also given to block catecholamine synthesis. Biochemical evaluation with plasma and/or urine adrenaline should be carried out two to six weeks post-surgery.53 Annual biochemical work-up for the first five years and once every two years thereafter is the minimum follow-up requirement. In the case of persistence or recurrence, localization studies should be sought. Sixty per cent of malignant pheochromocytoma sites show avid 131I-MIBG uptake.103 In specialized centres such tumors can be treated with therapeutic 131I-BG in single or fractionated doses totaling 200–1,400 mCi. Approximately 30 % of tumors show an objective response to therapy (40 % biochemical response) and 40 % of tumors remain stable (20 % biochemically).108 Radioiodine therapy may lead to serious adverse events, particularly in terms of bone marrow suppression.109–111 Less experience has been obtained with labelled somatostatin analogs.81 Overall, combination chemotherapy with dacarbazine cyclophosphamide and vincristine does not confer any significant survival benefit.112 Other regimens include etoposide plus cisplatin or etoposide plus lomustine with 5-fluorouracil.108 Radiofrequency ablation of metastatic foci can also be used.113 Another experimental modality is sunitinib, a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor.114

Prognosis
The life expectancy of patients with benign pheochromocytoma/ paraganglioma that has been successfully excised may not be different from that of the general population. Nevertheless, half of the patients that are successfully operated on have continued hypertension63,103 and overall 16 % of patients operated on for pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma have recurrent disease within 10 years.115 In a recent case series of children with pheochromocytoma/ paraganglioma, all were found to harbor a predisposing mutation but were alive after follow-up of five years.116 In a large cohort of patients with pheochromocytoma, however, mortality from a second neoplasia was four-fold higher compared with that of the general population.117

Recently, levels of the adrenomedullin RDC1 receptor were reported to be four times higher in malignant than in benign pheochromocytomas. Cells expressing SNAIL were frequent in metastatic pheochromocytomas compared to being absent in tumors without metastases. Despite these reports, the use of adrenomedullin RDC1 receptor and SNAIL levels as prognostic factors in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma is not yet envisaged.71,118 Pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndrome can be diagnosed reliably by immunohistochemistry.73 There are no criteria to predict survival following malignant pheochromocytoma. Surprisingly, however, 15-year survival rates of almost 50% have been reported, with a combination of therapeutic modalities.119

Modalities Currently being Evaluated/Introduced into Practice
Quantification of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma vesicular monoamine transporter content indicates whether the tumors are MIBG-avid.95,96,120 As PET imaging accessibility increases worldwide, more patients with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma will be evaluated with PET studies. Ultratrace 131I-MIBG has very high specific activity and holds promise for future therapeutic applications.48 New modalities for the medical management of malignant pheochromocytomas are currently being assessed. Among these, the combination of temozoline and thalidomide or therapeutic somatostatin analogues have shown some encouraging results.108

2

References

  1. de Herder WW, New options in investigation and management of (neuro-)endocrine tumors of the digestive tract and pancreas. Meet-the-Professor & Case Management Forum Handouts, 92nd Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 19–22 June 2010, Chevy Chase, The Endocrine Society, 2010:229–33.
  2. Raut CP, Kulke MH, Glickman JN, et al., Carcinoid tumors, Curr Probl Surg, 2006;43(6):383–450.
  3. Vinik A, Feliberti E, Perry R et al., Carcinoid tumors, Endotext, August 2, 2004. Available at: www.endotext. org/guthormones/guthormone2/guthormoneframe2.htm (accessed August 23, 2010).
  4. Kulke MH, Clinical presentation and management of carcinoid tumors, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 2007;21:433–55.
  5. Klöppel G, Tumour biology and histopathology of neuroendocrine tumours, Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007;21:15–31.
  6. Burnik FS, Yalçin S, NFKB1 -94 insertion/deletion ATTG polymorphism in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, Chemotherapy, 2009;55(5):381–5.
  7. Robertson RG, Geiger WJ, Davis NB, Carcinoid tumors, Am Fam Physician, 2006;74(3):429–34.
  8. van der Horst-Schrivers AN, Post WJ, Kema IP, et al., Persistent low urinary excretion of 5-HIAA is a marker for favourable survival during follow-up in patients with disseminated midgut carcinoid tumours, Eur J Cancer, 2007;43:2651–7.
  9. Whitman HH 3rd, Fishman EK, Oberg K, et al., Catecholaminesecreting metastatic carcinoid as differential diagnosis in pheochromocytoma: clinical, laboratory, and imaging clues in the search for the lurking neuroendocrine tumor (NET), Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006;1073:59–78. 10. de Herder WW, Biochemistry of neuroendocrine tumours, Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007;21:33–41.
  10. Vinik AI, Silva MP, Woltering EA, et al., Biochemical testing for neuroendocrine tumors, Pancreas, 2009;38(8):876–89.
  11. Ilias I, Torpy DJ, Pacak K, et al., Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic corticotropin secretion: twenty years’ experience at the National Institutes of Health, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005;90:4955–62.
  12. Tamm EP, Kim EE, Ng CS, Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 2007;21:409–32.
  13. Kamaoui I, De-Luca V, Ficarelli S, et al., Value of CT enteroclysis in suspected small-bowel carcinoid tumors, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010;194(3):629–33.
  14. Masselli G, Polettini E, Casciani E, et al., Small-bowel neoplasms: prospective evaluation of MR enteroclysis, Radiology, 2009;251(3):743–50. 16. Wong KK, Cahill JM, Frey KA, et al., Incremental value of 111-in pentetreotide SPECT/CT fusion imaging of neuroendocrine
  15. Zuetenhorst JM, Taal BG, Metastatic carcinoid tumors: a clinical review, Oncologist, 2005;10:123–31.
  16. Gabriel M, Decristoforo C, Kendler D, et al., 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3- octreotide PET in neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT, J Nucl Med, 2007;48:508–18.
  17. Kayani I, Bomanji JB, Groves A, et al., Functional imaging of neuroendocrine tumors with combined PET/CT using (68)Ga- DOTATATE (DOTA-DPhe(1),Tyr(3)-octreotate) and (18)F-FDG, Cancer, 2008;112(11):2447–55.
  18. Prasad V, Ambrosini V, Hommann M, et al., Detection of unknown primary neuroendocrine tumours (CUP-NET) using (68)Ga-DOTA-NOC receptor PET/CT, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2010;37(1):67–77.
  19. Carnaille B, Nocaudie M, Pattou F, et al., Scintiscans and carcinoid tumors, Surgery, 1994;116:1118–21.
  20. Hoefnagel CA, Metaiodobenzylguanidine and somatostatin in oncology: role in the management of neural crest tumours, Eur J Nucl Med, 1994;21:561–81.
  21. Bomanji J, Mather S, Moyes J, et al., A scintigraphic comparison of iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine and an iodine-labeled somatostatin analog (Tyr-3-octreotide) in metastatic carcinoid tumors, J Nucl Med, 1992;33:1121–4.
  22. Koopmans KP, de Vries EGE, Kema IP, et al. Staging of carcinoid tumors with 18F-DOPA PET: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study, Lancet Oncol, 2006;7:728–34.
  23. Koopmans KP, Neels OC, Kema IP, et al., Improved staging of patients with carcinoid and islet cell tumors with 18Fdihydroxy- phenyl-alanine and 11C-5-hydroxy-tryptophan positron emission tomography, J Clin Oncol, 2008;26:1489–95.
  24. Akerström G, Hellman P, Surgery on neuroendocrine tumours, Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007;21:87–109.
  25. Washington MK, Tang LH, Berlin J, et al. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid tumors) of the stomach, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2010;134(2):187–91.
  26. Washington MK, Tang LH, Berlin J, et al., Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid tumors) of the small intestine and ampulla, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2010;134(2):181–6.
  27. Washington MK, Tang LH, Berlin J, et al., Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid tumors) of the colon and rectum, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2010;134(2):176–80.
  28. Washington MK, Tang LH, Berlin J, et al., Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid tumors) of the appendix, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2010;134(2):171–5. 31. Garrot C, Stuart K, Liver-directed therapies for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 2007;21:545–60.
  29. Modlin IM, Pavel M, Kidd M, et al., Somatostatin analogues in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumours, Alimen Pharmacol Ther, 2010;31:169–88.
  30. li> Toumpanakis C, Garland J, Marelli L, et al., Long-term results of patients with malignant carcinoid syndrome receiving octreotide LAR, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2009;30(7):733–40.
  31. Bushnell D Jr, O’Dorisio TM, O’Dorisio MS, et al., 90Y-dotreotide for metastatic carcinoid refractory to octreotide, J Clin Oncol, 2010;28(10):1652–9.
  32. Bushnell D, Treatment of metastatic carcinoid tumors with radiolabeled biologic molecules, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2009;7(7):760–4.
  33. Postema EJ, McEwan AJ, Radioiodinated metaiodobenzylguanidine treatment of neuroendocrine tumors in adults, Cancer Biother Radiopharm, 2009;24(5): 519–25.
  34. Schnirer II, Yao JC, Ajani JA, Carcinoid-a comprehensive review, Acta Oncol, 2003;42:672–92.
  35. Dahan L, Bonnetain F, Rougier P, et al., Phase III trial of chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil and streptozotocin compared with interferon alpha for advanced carcinoid tumors: FNCLCC-FFCD 9710, Endocr Relat Cancer, 2009;16(4):1351–61.
  36. Davini F, Gonfiotti A, Comin C, et al., Typical and atypical carcinoid tumours: 20-year experience with 89 patients, J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2009;50(6):807–11.
  37. Lepage C, Ciccolallo L, De Angelis R, et al., European disparities in malignant digestive endocrine tumours survival, Int J Cancer, 2010;126(12):2928–34.
  38. Welin S, Stridsberg M, Cunningham J, et al., Elevated plasma chromogranin A is the first indication of recurrence in radically operated midgut carcinoid tumors, Neuroendocrinology, 2009;89(3):302–7.
  39. van Tuyl SA, van Noorden JT, Timmer R, et al., Detection of small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors by video capsule endoscopy, Gastrointest Endosc, 2006;64:66–72.
  40. Gustafsson BI, Siddique L, Chan A, et al. Uncommon cancers of the small intestine, appendix and colon: an analysis of SEER 1973-2004, and current diagnosis and therapy, Int J Oncol, 2008;33:1121–31.
  41. Rondonotti E, Pennazio M, Toth E, et al., Small-bowel neoplasms in patients undergoing video capsule endoscopy: a multicenter European study, Endoscopy, 2008;40(6):488–95.
  42. Spada C, Riccioni ME, Familiari P, et al., Video capsule endoscopy in small-bowel tumours: a single centre experience, Scand J Gastroenterol, 2008;43(4):497–505.
  43. Eriksson B, Bergström M, Sundin A, et al., The role of PET in localization of neuroendocrine and adrenocortical tumors, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2002;970:159–69.
  44. Pettinato C, Sarnelli A, Di Donna M, et al., 68Ga-DOTANOC: biodistribution and dosimetry in patients affected by neuroendocrine tumors, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2008;35:72–9.
  45. Coleman RE, Stubbs JB, Barrett JA, et al., Radiation dosimetry, pharmacokinetics, and safety of ultratrace Iobenguane I-131 in patients with malignant pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma or metastatic carcinoid, Cancer Biother Radiopharm, 2009;24(4):469–75.
  46. Kwekkeboom DJ, Teunissen JJ, Kam BL, et al., Treatment of patients who have endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 2007;21:561–73.
  47. Kaltsas GA, Papadogias D, Makras P, et al., Treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues, Endocr Relat Cancer, 2005;12:683–99.
  48. Raymond E, Faivre S, Hammel P, et al., Sunitinib paves the way for targeted therapies in neuroendocrine tumors, Target Oncol, 2009;4(4):253–4.
  49. Lack EE, Adrenal cortical nodules and tumor-like lesions. In: Tumors of the Adrenal Gland and Extra-adrenal Paraganglia, Washington, DC, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1997;49–89.
  50. Young WF Jr, Paragangliomas: clinical overview, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006;1073:21–9.
  51. Lack EE, Pheochromocytoma. In: Tumors of the adrenal gland and extra-adrenal paraganglia, Washington, DC, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1997:223–59.
  52. Mittendorf EA, Evans DB, Lee JE, et al., Pheochromocytoma: advances in genetics, diagnosis, localization, and treatment, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 2007;21:509–25.
  53. Plouin PF, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Pheochromocytomas and secreting paragangliomas, Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2006;1:49.
  54. Kaltsas GA, Papadogias D, Grossman AB, The clinical presentation (symptoms and signs) of sporadic and familial chromaffin cell tumours (phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas), Front Horm Res, 2004;31:61–75.
  55. Kaplan NM, Pheochromocytoma with a preface about incidental adrenal masses, in: Kaplan’s Clinical Hypertension, Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2006:389–433.
  56. Lack EE, Extra-adrenal paragangliomas of the sympathoadrenal neuroendocrine system. In: Tumors of the Adrenal Gland and Extraadrenal Paraganglia, Washington, DC, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1997;269–84.
  57. Lack EE, Carotid body paraganglioma. In: Tumors of the Adrenal Gland and Extra-adrenal Paraganglia, Washington, DC, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1997;321–42.
  58. Pacak K, Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma syndromes: what’s new? Meet-the-Professor & Case Management Forum Handouts, 92nd Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, June 19–22, 2010, Chevy Chase, The Endocrine Society, 2010;25–32.
  59. Srirangalingam U, Khoo B, Walker L, et al., Contrasting clinical manifestations of SDHB and VHL associated chromaffin tumours, Endocr Relat Cancer, 2009;16(2):515–25.
  60. Pacak K, Adams KT, Eisenhofer G, Pheochromocytoma, Endotext, December 6, 2006.
  61. Timmers HJ, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Mannelli M, et al., Clinical aspects of SDHx-related pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, Endocr Relat Cancer, 2009;16(2):391–400.
  62. Pasini B, Stratakis CA, SDH mutations in tumorigenesis and inherited endocrine tumours: lesson from the phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndromes, J Intern Med, 2009;266(1):19–42.
  63. Burnichon N, Brière JJ, Libé R, et al., SDHA is a tumor suppressor gene causing paraganglioma, Hum Mol Genet, 2010;19(15):3011–20.
  64. Bayley JP, Kunst HP, Cascon A, et al., SDHAF2 mutations in familial and sporadic paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma, Lancet Oncol, 2010;11(4):366–72.
  65. Yao L, Barontini M, Niederle B, et al., Mutations of the metabolic genes IDH1, IDH2, and SDHAF2 are not major determinants of the pseudohypoxic phenotype of sporadic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010;95:1469–72.
  66. Hao HX, Khalimonchuk O, Schraders M, et al., SDH5, a gene required for flavination of succinate dehydrogenase, is mutated in paraganglioma, Science, 2009;325:1139–42.
  67. Qin Y, Yao L, King EE, et al., Germline mutations in TMEM127 confer susceptibility to pheochromocytoma, Nat Genet, 2010;42(3):229–33.
  68. Häyry V, Salmenkivi K, Arola J, et al., High frequency of SNAILexpressing cells confirms and predicts metastatic potential of phaeochromocytoma, Endocr Relat Cancer, 2009;16(4):1211–8.
  69. Gill AJ, Benn DE, Chou A, et al., Immunohistochemistry for SDHB triages genetic testing of SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD in paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndromes, Hum Pathol, 2010;41(6):805–14.
  70. van Nederveen FH, Gaal J, Favier J, et al., An immunohistochemical procedure to detect patients with paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma with germline SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD gene mutations: a retrospective and prospective analysis, Lancet Oncol, 2009;10(8):764–71.
  71. Grossman A, Pacak K, Sawka A, et al., Biochemical diagnosis and localization of pheochromocytoma: can we reach a consensus? Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006;1073:332–47.
  72. Eisenhofer G, Lenders JW, Pacak K, Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, Front Horm Res, 2004;31:76–106.
  73. Lenders JW, Pacak K, Huynh TT, et al., Low sensitivity of glucagon provocative testing for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010;95(1):238–45.
  74. Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Walther MM, et al., Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: how to distinguish true- from false-positive test results, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2003;88:2656–26.
  75. van Duinen N, Steenvoorden D, Kema IP, et al., Increased urinary excretion of 3-methoxytyramine in patients with head and neck paragangliomas, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010;95:209–14.
  76. Ilias I, Pacak K, Current approaches and recommended algorithm for the diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2004;89:479–91.
  77. van den Berg R, Verbist BM, Mertens BJ, et al., Head and neck paragangliomas: improved tumor detection using contrastenhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography as compared with fat-suppressed MR imaging techniques, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2004;25:863–70.
  78. Rafferty MA, Walsh RM, Walsh MA, Somatostatin therapy for glomus tumors: a report of two cases, Skull Base, 2002;12(2):53–8.
  79. Whiteman ML, Serafini AN, Telischi FF, et al., 111In octreotide scintigraphy in the evaluation of head and neck lesions, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1997;18:1073–80.
  80. Go AS, Refining Probability: An introduction to the use of diagnostic tests. In: Friedland DJ (ed.), Evidence-Based Medicine, New York, NY: McGraw-Hil, 1998;12–33.
  81. Shulkin BL, Ilias I, Sisson JC, et al., Current trends in functional imaging of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006;1073:374–82.
  82. Meyer-Rochow GY, Schembri GP, Benn DE, et al., The utility of metaiodobenzylguanidine single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (MIBG SPECT/CT) for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, Ann Surg Oncol, 2010;17(2):392–400.
  83. Ilias I, Yu J, Carrasquillo JA, et al., Superiority of 6-[18F]- fluorodopamine positron emission tomography versus [131I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy in the localization of metastatic pheochromocytoma, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2003;88:4083–7.
  84. Kaji P, Carrasquillo JA, Linehan WM, et al., The role of 6- [18F]fluorodopamine positron emission tomography in the localization of adrenal pheochromocytoma associated with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, Eur J Endocrinol, 2007;156:483–7.
  85. Ilias I, Chen CC, Carrasquillo JA, et al., Comparison of 6-18Ffluorodopamine PET with 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine and 111in-pentetreotide scintigraphy in localization of nonmetastatic and metastatic pheochromocytoma, J Nucl Med, 2008;49:1613–9.
  86. Hoegerle S, Nitzsche E, Altehoefer C, et al., Pheochromocytomas: detection with 18F DOPA whole body PET-initial results, Radiology, 2002;222:507–12.
  87. Imani F, Agopian VG, Auerbach MS, et al., 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT accurately localize pheochromocytomas, J Nucl Med, 2009;50(4):513–19.
  88. Jager PL, Chirakal R, Marriott CJ, et al., 6-L-18Ffluorodihydroxyphenylalanine PET in neuroendocrine tumors: basic aspects and emerging clinical applications, J Nucl Med, 2008;49:573–86.
  89. Hofland LJ, Liu Q, Van Koetsveld PM, et al., Immunohistochemical detection of somatostatin receptor subtypes sst1 and sst2A in human somatostatin receptor positive tumors, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1999;84:775–80.
  90. Reubi JC, Waser B, Khosla S, et al., In vitro and in vivo detection of somatostatin receptors in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1992;74(5):1082–9.
  91. Mundschenk J, Unger N, Schulz S, et al., Somatostatin receptor subtypes in human pheochromocytoma: subcellular expression pattern and functional relevance for octreotide scintigraphy, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2003;88:5150–7.
  92. Ahlman H, Malignant pheochromocytoma: state of the field with future projections, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006;1073:449–64.
  93. Kölby L, Bernhardt P, Johanson V, et al., Can q quantification of VMAT and SSTR expression be helpful for planning radionuclide therapy of malignant pheochromocytomas? Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006;1073:491–7.
  94. Pawlikowski M, Somatostatin receptors in human tumors. In: Somatostatin Analogs in Diagnosis and Therapy, Austin, TX: Landes Bioscience, 2007;39–46.
  95. Ilias I, Pacak K, A clinical overview of pheochromocytomas/ paragangliomas and carcinoid tumors, Nucl Med Biol, 2008;35(Suppl. 1):S27–34.
  96. Timmers HJ, Chen CC, Carrasquillo JA, et al., Comparison of 18F-fluoro-L-DOPA, 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose, and 18Ffluorodopamine PET and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in the localization of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2009;94(12):4757–67.
  97. Mannelli M, Management and treatment of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006;1073:405–16.
  98. Pacak K, Preoperative management of the pheochromocytoma patient, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007;92:4069–79.
  99. Bravo EL, Tagle R, Pheochromocytoma: state-of-the-art and future prospects, Endocr Rev, 2004;24:539–53.
  100. Fitzgerald PA, Goldsby RE, Huberty JP, et al., Malignant pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a phase II study of therapy with high-dose 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131IMIBG), Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006;1073:465–90.
  101. Pacak K, Ilias I, Adams KT, et al., Biochemical diagnosis, localization and management of pheochromocytoma: focus on multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 in relation to other hereditary syndromes and sporadic forms of the tumour, J Intern Med, 2005;257:60–8.
  102. Kaye DR, Storey BB, Pacak K, et al., Partial Adrenalectomy: underused first line therapy for small adrenal tumors, J Urol, 2010;184(1):18–25.
  103. Parnaby CN, Serpell MG, Connell JM, et al., Perioperative haemodynamic changes in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for phaeochromocytomas and other adrenal tumours, Surgeon, 2010;8(1):9–14.
  104. Demeure MJ, Pheochromocytoma. In: Prinz RA, Staren ED (eds.), Endocrine Surgery, Austin, TX: Landes Bioscience, 2000;189–203.
  105. . Chrisoulidou A, Kaltsas G, Ilias I, et al., The diagnosis and management of malignant phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma, Endocr Relat Cancer, 2007;14:569–85.
  106. Loh KC, Fitzgerald PA, Matthay KK, et al., The treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma with iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG): a comprehensive review of 116 reported patients, J Endocrinol Invest, 1997;20:648–58.
  107. Rose B, Matthay KK, Price D, et al., High-dose 131-Imetaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for 12 patients with malignant pheochromocytoma, Cancer, 2003;98:239–48.
  108. Safford SD, Coleman RE, Gockerman JP, et al., Iodine -131 metaiodobenzylguanidine is an effective treatment for malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, Surgery, 2003;134:956–62.
  109. Huang H, Abraham J, Hung E, et al., Treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dacarbazine. Recommendation from a 22-year follow-up of 18 patients, Cancer, 2008;113:2020–8.
  110. Venkatesan AM, Locklin J, Lai EW, et al., Radiofrequency ablation of metastatic pheochromocytoma, J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2009;20(11):1483–90.
  111. . Park KS, Lee JL, Ahn H, et al., Sunitinib, a novel therapy for anthracycline- and cisplatin-refractory malignant pheochromocytoma, Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2009;39(5):327–31.
  112. Amar L, Servais A, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, et al., Year of diagnosis, features at presentation, and risk of recurrence in patients with pheochromocytoma or secreting paraganglioma, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005;90:2110–6.
  113. Hammond PJ, Murphy D, Carachi R, et al., Childhood phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma: 100% incidence of genetic mutations and 100% survival, J Pediatr Surg, 2010;45(2):383–6.
  114. Khorram-Manesh A, Jansson S, Wängberg B, et al., Mortality associated with pheochromocytoma: increased risk for additional tumors, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006;1073: 444–8.
  115. Thouënnon E, Pierre A, Tanguy Y, et al., Expression of trophic amidated peptides and their receptors in benign and malignant pheochromocytomas: high expression of adrenomedullin RDC1 receptor and implication in tumoral cell survival, Endocr Relat Cancer, 2010;17(3):637–51.
  116. Nomura K, Kimura H, Shimizu S, et al., Survival of patients with metastatic malignant pheochromocytoma and efficacy of combined cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dacarbazine chemotherapy, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2009;94(8):2850–6.
  117. Fottner C, Helisch A, Anlauf M, et al., 6-18F-fluoro-Ldihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography is superior to 123I-metaiodobenzyl-guanidine scintigraphy in the detection of extraadrenal and hereditary pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: correlation with vesicular monoamine transporter expression, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010;95:2800–10.
3

Article Information

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.

Correspondence

Ioannis Ilias, MD, Department of Endocrinology, E Venizelou Hospital, 2 E Venizelou Sq, Athens GR-11521, Greece. E: iiliasmd@yahoo.com

Received

2010-07-22T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
19 mins

Trending Topic
Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

The Horizon of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in the Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Nodules: Clinical Application and Future Perspectives

Seyedeh Niloofar Sharafi, Mohammad Moarefzadeh, Milad Tari Moradi

Thyroid nodules are common worldwide, and their prevalence is increasing. Most nodules are asymptomatic and detected incidentally on cross-sectional imaging or physical examination. In rare cases (10–15%), nodules are malignant and require diagnostic evaluation. Even malignant nodules frequently show non-aggressive behaviour.1 The increase in the incidence of thyroid cancer is unfairly distributed globally, and the […]

touchREVIEWS in Endocrinology. 2024;20(2):81–90
Advertisement
    • 5

    Related Content in Endocrine Oncology

    Latest articles videos and clinical updates - straight to your inbox

    Close Popup